State v. Lorthridge

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lorthridge

478 S.W.3d 550, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1321, 2015 WL 9303923

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 22, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102186

StatusPublished

This text of 478 S.W.3d 550 (State v. Lorthridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lorthridge, 478 S.W.3d 550, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1321, 2015 WL 9303923 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Felipe Q. Lorthridge (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions following a jury trial for one count of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.070;¹ two counts of felony possession of a controlled substance, heroin and methadone, in violation of Section 195.202; one count of misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of Section 195.202; and one count of misdemeanor possession of para[551]*551phernalia, in violation of Section 195.233. The trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of five years’ imprisonment on the weapon count; 10 years’ imprisonment on the two felony drug possession counts; one year of time served on the misdemeanor drug possession count; and one year of time served on paraphernalia count. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Felipe Q. Lorthridge (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions following a jury trial for one count of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.070;¹ two counts of felony possession of a controlled substance, heroin and methadone, in violation of Section 195.202; one count of misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of Section 195.202; and one count of misdemeanor possession of para[551]*551phernalia, in violation of Section 195.233. The trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of five years’ imprisonment on the weapon count; 10 years’ imprisonment on the two felony drug possession counts; one year of time served on the misdemeanor drug possession count; and one year of time served on paraphernalia count. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 S.W.3d 550, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1321, 2015 WL 9303923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lorthridge-moctapp-2015.