State v. Lordi

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lordi

740 N.E.2d 675, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 20

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 10, 2001

Docket00-2175

StatusPublished

This text of 740 N.E.2d 675 (State v. Lordi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lordi, 740 N.E.2d 675, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 20 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Mahoning App. Nos. 99CA247 and 99CA62. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary [1403]*1403appeal and claimed appeal as of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to continue bond as previously set by the court of appeals or set a new appeal bond, pending the filing and disposition of appellant’s motion to reopen appeal in the court of appeals,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to continue bond as previously set by the court of appeals be, and hereby is, granted.

Moyer, C.J., would grant the stay until the state has responded. Cook, J., would grant the stay and continue bond for ninety days or until disposition of the appellant’s motion to reopen appeal, whichever is earlier.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning App. Nos. 99CA247 and 99CA62. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary [1403]*1403appeal and claimed appeal as of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to continue bond as previously set by the court of appeals or set a new appeal bond, pending the filing and disposition of appellant’s motion to reopen appeal in the court of appeals,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to continue bond as previously set by the court of appeals be, and hereby is, granted.

Moyer, C.J., would grant the stay until the state has responded. Cook, J., would grant the stay and continue bond for ninety days or until disposition of the appellant’s motion to reopen appeal, whichever is earlier.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

740 N.E.2d 675, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lordi-ohio-2001.