State v. Lopez-Minjarez

240 P.3d 753, 237 Or. App. 688
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 13, 2010·No. C053660CR A134227·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

240 P.3d 753 (2010)
237 Or. App. 688

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Petronilo LOPEZ-MINJAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

C053660CR; A134227.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

On Respondent's Petition for Reconsideration September 2, 2010.
Decided October 13, 2010.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jennifer S. Lloyd, Attorney-in-Charge Criminal Appeals, for petition.

Before SERCOMBE, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and DEITS, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The state has petitioned this court for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Lopez-Minjarez, 236 Or.App. 270, 237 P.3d 223 (2010). The state correctly points out that our disposition of that case erroneously failed to remand the case for resentencing on defendant's affirmed convictions. The state's point is well taken; we grant the petition for reconsideration and modify our disposition accordingly.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; convictions for aggravated murder and felony murder reversed and remanded; case remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lopez-Minjarez, 240 P.3d 753, 237 Or. App. 688 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

240 P.3d 753 (State v. Lopez-Minjarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walraven v. Premo
372 P.3d 1 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
Hale v. Belleque
312 P.3d 533 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)
State v. Perez-Chi
271 P.3d 115 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2011)
State v. Fernandez
262 P.3d 1167 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. Lopez-Minjarez
260 P.3d 439 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2011)
State v. Tucker
251 P.3d 224 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. PEREZ-CHI
255 P.3d 497 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
State v. BARANOVICH
249 P.3d 1284 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)