State v. Lopez

408 So. 2d 744, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18924
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 1982·No. No. 81-266·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lopez pled guilty to an information which charged him with carrying a firearm in the course of a robbery. Nonetheless, the trial court’s five-year sentence did not include a provision that he serve a minimum mandatory three-year term without eligibility for parole or gain time, as is required under these circumstances by Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1979). We agree with the state’s position1 that there is nothing to justify this omission. D’Alessandro v. Shearer, 360 So.2d 774 (Fla.1978). Hence, the sentence is reversed in part and the cause remanded with directions to make the sentence imposed as to Count I of the information subject to the three-year mandatory requirement.2

Reversed and remanded.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lopez, 408 So. 2d 744, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

408 So. 2d 744 (State v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walter Bailey v. The State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
State v. Strazdins
890 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
State v. Fulton
878 So. 2d 485 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
State v. R.F.
648 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Williams v. State
517 So. 2d 681 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Aikens v. State
423 So. 2d 593 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)