State v. Lopez

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Lopez

840 A.2d 1174, 267 Conn. 912, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 22

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJanuary 13, 2004

DocketSC 17123

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 840 A.2d 1174 (State v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lopez, 840 A.2d 1174, 267 Conn. 912, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 22 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 386 (AC 22637), is granted, limited to the foUowing issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s inquiry into a possible conflict of interest between the defendant and defense counsel was inadequate and, if so, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to a reversal of his conviction in the absence of a specific showing of harm?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 386 (AC 22637), is granted, limited to the foUowing issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s inquiry into a possible conflict of interest between the defendant and defense counsel was inadequate and, if so, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to a reversal of his conviction in the absence of a specific showing of harm?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 A.2d 1174, 267 Conn. 912, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lopez-conn-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack