State v. Looney
96 S.W. 316, 116 Mo. App. 592, 1906 Mo. App. LEXIS 171
Opinion
We incline to the opinion that the jurisdiction of this appeal is in the Supreme Court as involving a construction of the revenue laws of the State. It involves, too, the interstate commerce clause of the National Constitution, if that point was properly raised below. Several appeals in identical cases have been taken to the Supreme Court and retained by it. [State v. Emert, 103 Mo. 241, 15 S. W. 81; State v. Smithson, 106 Mo. 149, 17 S. W. 221; State v. Parsons, 124 Mo. 436, 27 S. W. 1102.]
Ordered transferred to the Supreme Court for decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Looney, 96 S.W. 316, 116 Mo. App. 592, 1906 Mo. App. LEXIS 171 (Mo. Ct. App. 1906).
96 S.W. 316 (State v. Looney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lauridsen
312 S.W.2d 140 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1958)
City of Eldorado Springs v. Highfill
152 S.W. 617 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)