State v. . Long

2 N.C. 455
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided March 5, 1797·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Where A makes a confession, and relates circumstances which are proven to have actually existed as related in the confession, that may be evidence sufficient for a jury to proceed upon to convict the prisoner; but a naked confession, unattended with circumstances, is not sufficient. A confession, from the very nature of the thing, is a very doubtful species of evidence, and to be received with great caution. It is hardly to be supposed that a man perfectly possessed of himself would make a confession to take away his own life. It must generally proceed from a promise or hope of favor, or from a dread of punishment, and in such situations the mind is agitated — the man may be easily tempted to go further than the truth. Besides, the witness, respecting the confession, may have mistaken his meaning. How easy is it to understand the speaking differently from what he meant; and the smallest mistake in this particular might prove fatal. As there are no confirmatory circumstances in the present case, it is better to acquit the prisoner.

The jury found him not guilty. *Page 361

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Long, 2 N.C. 455 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

2 N.C. 455 (State v. . Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
669 S.E.2d 299 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)