State v. Long

705 S.E.2d 735, 365 N.C. 5, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 28
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 4, 2011·No. 265PA09·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the order of the superior court. Accordingly, the order of the superior court is affirmed. See, e.g., State v. Greene, 298 N.C. 268, 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979); State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E.2d 260 (1974).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Long, 705 S.E.2d 735, 365 N.C. 5, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 28 (N.C. 2011).

705 S.E.2d 735 (State v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ronnie Long v. Erik Hooks
947 F.3d 159 (Fourth Circuit, 2020)
State v. Royster
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2019
Piro v. McKeever
794 S.E.2d 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2016)
CommScope Credit Union v. Butler & Burke, LLP
790 S.E.2d 657 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2016)
Faires v. State Board of Elections
784 S.E.2d 463 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2016)
Faires v. State Bd. of Elections
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2016