State v. Long

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Long

880 S.W.2d 649, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1301, 1994 WL 411934

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Long. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 9, 1994·No. No. 64439·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by amended information with unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986. Defendant was convicted by a jury. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a prison term of four years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the [650]*650reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by amended information with unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986. Defendant was convicted by a jury. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a prison term of four years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the [650]*650reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).

State v. Long, 880 S.W.2d 649, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1301, 1994 WL 411934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

880 S.W.2d 649 (State v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.