Home/Wisconsin Supreme Court/State v. Lonergan

State v. Lonergan

204 N.W.2d 678, 57 Wis. 2d 767, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1607
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 27, 1973
DocketNo. State 121
StatusPublished

This text of 204 N.W.2d 678 (State v. Lonergan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lonergan, 204 N.W.2d 678, 57 Wis. 2d 767, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1607 (Wis. 1973).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The single issue dispositive of this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to establish the defense of entrapment to the charge of sale of marijuana.The court after a review of the record concludes that there was sufficient evidence presented to the trial court [768]*768to enable it to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had a prior disposition to commit the crime. Therefore the defense of entrapment fails. See Hawthorne v. State (1969), 43 Wis. 2d 82, 168 N. W. 2d 85; see also: State v. Monsoor (1973), 56 Wis. 2d 689, 203 N. W. 2d 20.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Monsoor
203 N.W.2d 20 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
Hawthorne v. State
168 N.W.2d 86 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 N.W.2d 678, 57 Wis. 2d 767, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lonergan-wis-1973.