State v. Lomax

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lomax

718 N.E.2d 930, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3508

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 1, 1999

Docket99-889 and 99-1113

StatusPublished

This text of 718 N.E.2d 930 (State v. Lomax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lomax, 718 N.E.2d 930, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3508 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Sandusky C.P. No. 96CR448 and Sandusky App. Nos. S-97-037 and S-99-014. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Sandusky County, Supreme Court case No. 99-889, and as an appeal from the Court of Appeals of Sandusky County, Supreme Court case No. 99-1113.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that case Nos. 99-889 and 99-1113 be, and hereby are, consolidated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall combine further briefing of case Nos. 99-889 and 99-1113 and file one brief for each brief permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX(5). The parties shall file an original of each brief in case No. 99-889 and in case No. 99-1113 and a total of eighteen copies. The parties shall otherwise comply with the provisions of S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX and any other applicable rules of practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandusky C.P. No. 96CR448 and Sandusky App. Nos. S-97-037 and S-99-014. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Sandusky County, Supreme Court case No. 99-889, and as an appeal from the Court of Appeals of Sandusky County, Supreme Court case No. 99-1113.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that case Nos. 99-889 and 99-1113 be, and hereby are, consolidated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall combine further briefing of case Nos. 99-889 and 99-1113 and file one brief for each brief permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX(5). The parties shall file an original of each brief in case No. 99-889 and in case No. 99-1113 and a total of eighteen copies. The parties shall otherwise comply with the provisions of S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX and any other applicable rules of practice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

718 N.E.2d 930, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lomax-ohio-1999.