State v. Lomax

470 S.W.2d 161, 1971 Mo. App. LEXIS 600
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 16, 1971
DocketNo. 9127
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 470 S.W.2d 161 (State v. Lomax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lomax, 470 S.W.2d 161, 1971 Mo. App. LEXIS 600 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By information filed in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, it was charged that on or about September 10, 1970, defendant “did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously have in his possession, and under his control, a certain narcotic drug, to-wit: marihuana.” § 195.020.1 The jury found defendant guilty but could not agree upon the punishment, and the trial court (Crim.Rule 27.03) assessed his punishment in the county jail for a period of one year. § 195.200, subd. 1(1).2 After due proceedings, defendant appealed to this court.

“The term ‘felony’, when used in * * * any * * * statute, shall be construed to mean any offense for which the offender, on conviction, is liable by law to be punished with death or imprisonment in a correctional institution of the state department of corrections, and no other.” § 556.020. Although defendant’s punishment was assessed at imprisonment in a county jail for one year, he was convicted of an offense punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary; hence, defendant has been charged with [162]*162and convicted of a felony. State v. Echols, Mo., 467 S.W.2d 893, 896(4). “The supreme court shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction * * * in all cases of felony.” Constitution of Missouri, art. V, § 3, V.A.M.S. It is our duty to determine, ex mero motu, if we possess appellate jurisdiction [Kansas City v. Howe, Mo.App., 416 S.W.2d 683, 686(2-3)], and as it appears that we do not, our only authority in this matter is to transfer the cause to the Supreme Court of Missouri. Constitution of Missouri, art. V, § 11, V.A.M.S.; Nance v. Kimbrow, Mo.App., 460 S.W.2d 290, 291(1). It is so ordered.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moses v. Carnahan
186 S.W.3d 889 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)
State v. Smith
498 S.W.2d 595 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 S.W.2d 161, 1971 Mo. App. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lomax-moctapp-1971.