State v. Logue

Montana Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 2020·No. DA 19-0589·Unpublished

Opinion

ORIGINAL 06/23/2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 19-0589

DA 19-0589

FILED STATE Of MONTANA JUN 2 3 2020 Plaintiff and Appellee, Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana

v. ORDER

CLARENCE REDMOND LOGUE JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Within a span of one week, self-represented Appellant Clarence Redmond Logue filed a Supplemental Brief and Argument re: Transcripts for DC-17-339-B and a Motion for Credit for Time Served. The State of Montana has filed a response in opposition, stating that Logue's motions are inappropriate and untimely. M. R. App. P. 16(2) and 12(10). Upon review of our docket, this appeal was sent to this Court on June 19, 2020, because briefing was completed the day before. We also observe that this Court has denied Logue's several attempts to include such supplemental information after Logue filed his opening brief. A decision will be issued in due course. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Logue's Supplemental Brief and Argument re: Transcripts for DC-17-339-B and a Motion for Credit for Time Served in Case No. DC-17-339-B with Good Cause are DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel of record and to Clarence Redmond Logue Jr. DATED this A.:2 — day of June, 2020. For the Court,

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Logue, (Mo. 2020).

State v. Logue (State v. Logue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.