State v. . Logan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Logan

120 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 780, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 361

DecidedDecember 5, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E. 926 (State v. . Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Logan, 120 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 780, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 361 (N.C. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant with manufacturing spirituous liquors in violation of C. S., 4453.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, the defendant appealed. Defendant relies entirely upon his demurrer to the evidence and motion for dismissal, or for judgment as of nonsuit under C. S., 4643. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the accepted position on a motion of this kind (S. v. Rountree, 181 N.C. 535), we think the trial court was justified in submitting the case to the jury, and that the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.

No benefit would be derived from detailing the testimony of the several witnesses, as the only question before us is whether it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant with manufacturing spirituous liquors in violation of C. S., 4453.

From an adverse verdict and judgment pronounced thereon, the defendant appealed. Defendant relies entirely upon his demurrer to the evidence and motion for dismissal, or for judgment as of nonsuit under C. S., 4643. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the accepted position on a motion of this kind (S. v. Rountree, 181 N.C. 535), we think the trial court was justified in submitting the case to the jury, and that the verdict is fully supported by the evidence.

No benefit would be derived from detailing the testimony of the several witnesses, as the only question before us is whether it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 780, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-logan-nc-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack