State v. Loesser

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Loesser

659 N.E.2d 1287, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1510

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 31, 1996

Docket95-2441

StatusPublished

This text of 659 N.E.2d 1287 (State v. Loesser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Loesser, 659 N.E.2d 1287, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1510 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga County, No. 66762. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed December 5, 1995: “The motion of the appellant to certify a’ conflict between this Court’s decision and the judgment in State v. Trivedi (1982), 8 Ohio App.3d 412 [8 OBR 534, 457 N.E.2d 868], is hereby granted.

“The rule of law upon which this alleged conflict exists is whether the trial court, pursuant to R.C. 2951.02(B)(9) and R.C. 2951.02(C), has the authority to order restitution as a condition of probation as [1511]*1511compensation to the victim for injury, damage or loss .sustained other than property damage or the value of the property which is subject of any theft offense.”

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 95-2439, infra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga County, No. 66762. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed December 5, 1995: “The motion of the appellant to certify a’ conflict between this Court’s decision and the judgment in State v. Trivedi (1982), 8 Ohio App.3d 412 [8 OBR 534, 457 N.E.2d 868], is hereby granted.

“The rule of law upon which this alleged conflict exists is whether the trial court, pursuant to R.C. 2951.02(B)(9) and R.C. 2951.02(C), has the authority to order restitution as a condition of probation as [1511]*1511compensation to the victim for injury, damage or loss .sustained other than property damage or the value of the property which is subject of any theft offense.”

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 95-2439, infra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 N.E.2d 1287, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-loesser-ohio-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack