State v. Lodico

95 A. 626, 88 N.J.L. 394, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 343

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Vredenbubgh, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lodico, 95 A. 626, 88 N.J.L. 394, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 343 (N.J. 1915).

Pincite

95 A. 626 (State v. Lodico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.