State v. Lockwood
This text of 2022 ND 175 (State v. Lockwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 175
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher Lockwood, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20220019, 20220020 and 20220021
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel J. Borgen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joshua A. Amundson, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Christopher W. Lockwood, Bismarck, ND, self-represented, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Lockwood Nos. 20220019, 20220020 & 20220021
[¶1] Christopher Lockwood appeals from three amended criminal judgments revoking his probation and resentencing him. It is unclear what Lockwood argues on appeal because his brief does not contain the minimum requirements in N.D.R.App.P. 28. Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8), this Court may summarily affirm a judgment if the appellant’s brief fails to comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 175, 980 N.W.2d 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lockwood-nd-2022.