State v. Lockstand

Indiana Supreme Court

State v. Lockstand

8 Ind. 138

DecidedNovember 27, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ind. 138 (State v. Lockstand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lockstand, 8 Ind. 138 (Ind. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Guriam.

Prosecution for nuisance for keeping a house in which spirituous liquors were sold by retail without license, in violation of the act of 1853. Acts of [139]*1391853, p. 87. On motion of the defendant, the information was quashed, for want of a sufficient affidavit support it. This was right. The affidavit does not state that the liquor was sold in or about any house or place, or even in the county of Tippecanoe. See The State v. Lockstand, 4 Ind. R. 572.

L. Reilly, for the State.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Guriam.

Prosecution for nuisance for keeping a house in which spirituous liquors were sold by retail without license, in violation of the act of 1853. Acts of [139]*1391853, p. 87. On motion of the defendant, the information was quashed, for want of a sufficient affidavit support it. This was right. The affidavit does not state that the liquor was sold in or about any house or place, or even in the county of Tippecanoe. See The State v. Lockstand, 4 Ind. R. 572.

L. Reilly, for the State.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ind. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lockstand-ind-1856.