State v. Locklear

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Locklear

182 S.E.2d 200, 12 N.C. App. 36, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1273

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 14, 1971

DocketNo. 7116SC381

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 S.E.2d 200 (State v. Locklear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Locklear, 182 S.E.2d 200, 12 N.C. App. 36, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1273 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The judgment in this case was entered on 4 September 1970. The case on appeal was not docketed in this Court until 21 April 1971 and no order extending the time for docketing appears in the record. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals allows 90 days to docket the case on appeal, [37]*37provided that the trial judge may extend the time for an additional 60 days upon a showing of good cause. As this case was not docketed within either of the prescribed periods of time, the appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the Rules.

We have, nevertheless, examined the record and do not find prejudicial error.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Britt and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The judgment in this case was entered on 4 September 1970. The case on appeal was not docketed in this Court until 21 April 1971 and no order extending the time for docketing appears in the record. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals allows 90 days to docket the case on appeal, [37]*37provided that the trial judge may extend the time for an additional 60 days upon a showing of good cause. As this case was not docketed within either of the prescribed periods of time, the appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the Rules.

We have, nevertheless, examined the record and do not find prejudicial error.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Britt and Graham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 S.E.2d 200, 12 N.C. App. 36, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-locklear-ncctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack