State v. Lloyd

946 N.E.2d 239, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 4, 2011·No. 2011-0212·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Holmes App. No. 09 CA 12, 2010-Ohio-6562. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, III, IV, and V. McGee Brown, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V. O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lloyd, 946 N.E.2d 239, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481 (Ohio 2011).

946 N.E.2d 239 (State v. Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lloyd
2012 Ohio 2015 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)