State v. Lizzol

156 P.3d 694, 141 N.M. 403
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 2006
DocketNo. 30,019
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 P.3d 694 (State v. Lizzol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lizzol, 156 P.3d 694, 141 N.M. 403 (N.M. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon motion to hold in abeyance the opinion issued by the New Mexico Court of Appeals, and the Court having considered said motion and being sufficiently advised, Chief Justice Richard C. Bosson, Justice Patricio M. Serna, Justice Petra Jimenez Maes, and Justice Edward L. Chávez concurring, Justice Pamela B. Minzner not participating;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion hereby is GRANTED and the opinion issued by the New Mexico Court of Appeals shall be held in abeyance and not published pending final resolution by this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne Cannon
254 S.W.3d 287 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 P.3d 694, 141 N.M. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lizzol-nm-2006.