State v. Lizzol

156 P.3d 694, 141 N.M. 403
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 2006·No. No. 30,019·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon motion to hold in abeyance the opinion issued by the New Mexico Court of Appeals, and the Court having considered said motion and being sufficiently advised, Chief Justice Richard C. Bosson, Justice Patricio M. Serna, Justice Petra Jimenez Maes, and Justice Edward L. Chávez concurring, Justice Pamela B. Minzner not participating;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion hereby is GRANTED and the opinion issued by the New Mexico Court of Appeals shall be held in abeyance and not published pending final resolution by this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lizzol, 156 P.3d 694, 141 N.M. 403 (N.M. 2006).

156 P.3d 694 (State v. Lizzol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne Cannon
254 S.W.3d 287 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2008)