State v. Livingston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Livingston

142 S.W.3d 747, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 709, 2004 WL 1098984

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Livingston. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 150 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 2004·No. No. ED 82820·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, David Livingston, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree and felony stealing. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of eight years’ imprisonment to be served consecutively to another sentence from a different case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, David Livingston, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree and felony stealing. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of eight years’ imprisonment to be served consecutively to another sentence from a different case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Livingston, 142 S.W.3d 747, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 709, 2004 WL 1098984 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

142 S.W.3d 747 (State v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.