State v. Little
This text of 139 S.E.2d 8 (State v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was ample evidence to support the verdict. Hence, the assignment of error directed to the court’s denial of defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit is overruled. Moreover, it is our opinion, and we so decide, that the matters referred to in defendant’s remaining assignments, if error, are not of such prejudicial nature as to constitute ground for the award of a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.E.2d 8, 263 N.C. 130, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-little-nc-1964.