State v. Litherland

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Litherland

541 S.W.3d 13

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105130

StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 13 (State v. Litherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Litherland, 541 S.W.3d 13 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nannette Litherland appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction following a jury trial for first-degree murder and first-degree assault. Finding no reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different conclusion but for the challenged testimony, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nannette Litherland appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction following a jury trial for first-degree murder and first-degree assault. Finding no reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different conclusion but for the challenged testimony, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 S.W.3d 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-litherland-moctapp-2018.