State v. Litherland

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Litherland

541 S.W.3d 13

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2018·No. No. ED 105130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nannette Litherland appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction following a jury trial for first-degree murder and first-degree assault. Finding no reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different conclusion but for the challenged testimony, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nannette Litherland appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction following a jury trial for first-degree murder and first-degree assault. Finding no reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different conclusion but for the challenged testimony, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Litherland, 541 S.W.3d 13 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

541 S.W.3d 13 (State v. Litherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.