State v. Liston

415 S.W.3d 163, 2013 WL 6433187, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 10, 2013·No. No. ED 99310·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamaal Liston (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of second-degree burglary, Section 569.170, RSMo 2000,1 one count of stealing, Section 570.030, and one count of resisting arrest, Section 575.150. Defendant argues the trial court plainly erred in finding he was a persistent felony offender.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Liston, 415 S.W.3d 163, 2013 WL 6433187, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

415 S.W.3d 163 (State v. Liston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.