State v. Liston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Liston

116 S.W.3d 698, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463, 2003 WL 22127900

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2003·No. ED 81891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Liston appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence and the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in overruling the appellant’s objection and denying his motions. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment *699 pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Liston appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence and the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in overruling the appellant’s objection and denying his motions. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment *699 pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Liston, 116 S.W.3d 698, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463, 2003 WL 22127900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

116 S.W.3d 698 (State v. Liston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related