State v. Lipsett

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Lipsett

111 A. 161, 119 Me. 596, 1920 Me. LEXIS 80

DecidedAugust 11, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A. 161 (State v. Lipsett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lipsett, 111 A. 161, 119 Me. 596, 1920 Me. LEXIS 80 (Me. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

This is a complaint againt the respondent for the violation of a traffic ordinance of the City of Bangor. At the close of the evidence respondent moved for a directed verdict in his favor. This was refused by the presiding Justice and a verdict of guilty was rendered by the jury. Thereupon the respondent alleged exceptions. At the Portland Law Term the entry was made that briefs should be filed on or before August 1, 1920, or exceptions would be overruled. No brief has been filed by the respondent and the entry must therefore be, Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a complaint againt the respondent for the violation of a traffic ordinance of the City of Bangor. At the close of the evidence respondent moved for a directed verdict in his favor. This was refused by the presiding Justice and a verdict of guilty was rendered by the jury. Thereupon the respondent alleged exceptions. At the Portland Law Term the entry was made that briefs should be filed on or before August 1, 1920, or exceptions would be overruled. No brief has been filed by the respondent and the entry must therefore be, Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A. 161, 119 Me. 596, 1920 Me. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lipsett-me-1920.