State v. Ling
This text of 978 P.2d 450 (State v. Ling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal of an order of civil commitment, appellant contends that the order is not supported by clear and convincing evidence that he is mentally ill within the meaning of ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). In response, the state concedes that the order should be reversed, albeit on a different ground. The state observes that the trial court failed to advise appellant of his rights at the commitment hearing in violation of ORS 426.100(1) and contends that the lack of an appropriate advice of rights is entirely dispositive of the appeal. We accept the state’s concession.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
978 P.2d 450, 159 Or. App. 671, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ling-orctapp-1999.