State v. Lindsey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lindsey

368 S.W.3d 243, 2012 WL 1032916, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 407

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lindsey. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1572 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 2012·No. No. ED 96300·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Lindsey appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of one count of attempted forcible rape, one count of misdemeanor stealing, and one count of third-degree misdemeanor assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Lindsey appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of one count of attempted forcible rape, one count of misdemeanor stealing, and one count of third-degree misdemeanor assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Lindsey, 368 S.W.3d 243, 2012 WL 1032916, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 407 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

368 S.W.3d 243 (State v. Lindsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.