State v. Lindsay

47 So. 687, 122 La. 375, 1908 La. LEXIS 465
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 16, 1908
DocketNo. 17,174
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 47 So. 687 (State v. Lindsay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lindsay, 47 So. 687, 122 La. 375, 1908 La. LEXIS 465 (La. 1908).

Opinion

PROYOSTY, J.

The judgment against defendant sentences him to five years in the penitentiary for manslaughter.

The wife of the-defendant kept a boarding house, at which the deceased and several other young men boarded. Defendant came home with a pistol in his hand, and ordered deceased out of the house, and deceased challenged defendant to come out and settle the matter. The parties had had a difficulty, but how long ago is not shown. The defendant remained in the house. The deceased went no further than the gallery. A witness saw him there, and asked him, “What was the matter?” and he answered: “Me and Doc. Lindsay [meaning defendant] is going to have it. He told me to go out of his house.” The witness said to him: “Kennie, go on and go to bed.” And he answered : “I am going to wait until he [meaning defendant] comes out.” The defendant, about half an hour after he had ordered the deceased out, walked out on the gallery, still having the pistol in his hand. Immediately the parties came together. There was a short scuffle. Two shots were fired (during the scuffle, as we understand), with the result that the deceased was killed. The deceased was unarmed. The record does not show whether the defendant when he walked out knew that the deceased was on the gallery. No one saw the beginning of the conflict.

The said statements of the deceased were held by the court to be uncommunieated threats, and, as such, inadmissible.

This was error. It was not as threats that the said statements' were offered to be proved, but as a circumstance tending to show who had been the aggressor in the conflict. State v. Williams, 40 La. Ann. 168, 3 South. 629; Wharton, Grim. Ev. (9th Ed.) § 757.

Judgment set aside, and case remanded for trial.

BREAUX, C. J. I dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dreher
118 So. 85 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
State v. Harvey
106 So. 28 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
State v. Sandiford
90 So. 261 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1921)
State v. Davis
53 So. 558 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)
State v. Bouvy
50 So. 849 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)
State v. Barksdale
48 So. 264 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 So. 687, 122 La. 375, 1908 La. LEXIS 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lindsay-la-1908.