State v. Lindemann

358 P.3d 328, 272 Or. App. 780, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 962
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 12, 2015·No. 131354; A155636·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged, ORS 811.700; failure to appear on a criminal citation, ORS 133.076; and second-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.195. We reject without written discussion defendant’s first and second assignments of error and write only to address his third assignment, which challenges the trial court’s imposition of a $60 “mandatory state amount” for each conviction. Defendant points out that the trial court imposed fines of $500 or $250 for each conviction, as allowed by ORS 153.633, and argues that there is no statutory authority to separately impose additional fines.1 The state concedes that the $60 “mandatory state amount” fees were imposed in error. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the portion of the judgment requiring defendant to pay $60 for each conviction.

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $60 for each conviction reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lindemann, 358 P.3d 328, 272 Or. App. 780, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 962 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).

358 P.3d 328 (State v. Lindemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hodges
391 P.3d 993 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)
State v. Spence
391 P.3d 1001 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)
State v. Stier
383 P.3d 970 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
State v. Mryczko
379 P.3d 869 (Lincoln County Circuit Court, Oregon, 2016)
State v. Wiggins
374 P.3d 961 (Douglas County Circuit Court, Oregon, 2016)
State v. Machado
373 P.3d 1224 (Umatilla County Circuit Court, Oregon, 2016)
State v. Sasser
364 P.3d 352 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2015)
State v. Nutt
360 P.3d 636 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2015)