State v. Lilly
464 S.E.2d 42, 342 N.C. 409, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 670
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the concurring opinion in the Court of Appeals by Lewis, J., rather than those stated in the opinion for the court, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. See State v. Lilly, 117 N.C. App. 192, 196-97, 450 S.E.2d 546, 549 (1994) (Lewis, J., concurring in the result).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lilly, 464 S.E.2d 42, 342 N.C. 409, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 670 (N.C. 1995).
464 S.E.2d 42 (State v. Lilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ackerman
551 S.E.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)