State v. Lilly
235 S.E.2d 64, 292 N.C. 643, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1164
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Danny LILLY.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Danny Lilly, in pro. per.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., James E. Scarbrough, Associate Atty., for the State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 32 N.C.App. 467, 232 S.E.2d 495. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lilly, 235 S.E.2d 64, 292 N.C. 643, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1164 (N.C. 1977).
235 S.E.2d 64 (State v. Lilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Flaugher
713 S.E.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
State v. Hill
647 S.E.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Crow
623 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Artis
622 S.E.2d 204 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Barnes
479 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
State v. Barnes
478 S.E.2d 188 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1996)
State v. Powell
446 S.E.2d 26 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1994)
State v. Rasor
356 S.E.2d 328 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Glidden
346 S.E.2d 470 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
State v. Hope
345 S.E.2d 361 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
State v. Hope
335 S.E.2d 218 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
State v. McGill
326 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
State v. Hageman
296 S.E.2d 433 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Huff
289 S.E.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Martin
267 S.E.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
State v. Handsome
266 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)