State v. Lilley
1919 OK 311, 184 P. 946, 76 Okla. 229, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 167
Opinion
It having been made to appear that petitioner, W. E. Lambert, has complied with the order of the court, for violation of which he was imprisoned, a determination of the questions presented by his petition for writ of habeas corpus would serve no useful purpose.
The action is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lilley, 1919 OK 311, 184 P. 946, 76 Okla. 229, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 167 (Okla. 1919).
1919 OK 311 (State v. Lilley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. First State Bank, Watonga
1981 OK 53 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1981)