State v. Liggins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Liggins

878 S.W.2d 472, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 877, 1994 WL 226797

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 1994·No. No. 61752·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of trafficking drugs in the second degree in violation of § 195.223 RSMo (Supp.1992). Defendant was sentenced as a prior, persistent and class X offender to 30 years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from the court’s dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rules 84.16(b) and 30.-25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of trafficking drugs in the second degree in violation of § 195.223 RSMo (Supp.1992). Defendant was sentenced as a prior, persistent and class X offender to 30 years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from the court’s dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rules 84.16(b) and 30.-25(b).

State v. Liggins, 878 S.W.2d 472, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 877, 1994 WL 226797 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

878 S.W.2d 472 (State v. Liggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.