State v. Lige

100 A.3d 536, 220 N.J. 20, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1097
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 29, 2014·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashrafi’s opinion of the [21] Appellate Division reported at 429 N.J.Super. 490, 60 A.3d 514 (2013).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned)—7.

Opposed—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lige, 100 A.3d 536, 220 N.J. 20, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1097 (N.J. 2014).

100 A.3d 536 (State v. Lige) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

L.T. v. F.M.
102 A.3d 398 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)