State v. Lige

100 A.3d 536, 220 N.J. 20, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1097
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 29, 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 A.3d 536 (State v. Lige) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lige, 100 A.3d 536, 220 N.J. 20, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1097 (N.J. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashrafi’s opinion of the [21]*21Appellate Division reported at 429 N.J.Super. 490, 60 A.3d 514 (2013).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned)—7.

Opposed—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L.T. v. F.M.
102 A.3d 398 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.3d 536, 220 N.J. 20, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lige-nj-2014.