State v. Lewis

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

State v. Lewis

1 S.C.L. 1

DecidedNovember 15, 1783

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C.L. 1 (State v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lewis, 1 S.C.L. 1 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1783).

Pincite

Opinion

Grimke, J.

was of opinion, that upon the grounds urged by the prisoner’s counsel, and for the reasons set forth in the affidavit, the trial ought to be postponed. He observed, that there was a great difference between the case of a prisoner who had been committed only a day or two pre[3]*3vious to the sitting of the court, or during its session, and who, for the reasons mentioned, could not be supposed to be ready for trial; and that of one, who had sufficient time to summon his witnesses, and be fully prepared. The rule of law for putting off trials, was the same in criminal, as in civil cases. And the Court never would hurry on an unfortunate fellow-citizen to a trial, without giving him a reasonable time to prepare for his defence, however dangerous the nature of the offence might be, of which he stood accused. And relied on the case of Lord Kilmarnock and others, Fast. 2. as in point on this head.

The trial was accordingly put off, till the ensuing court of sessions.

Note. Although the above is only a Nisi Prius case, yet it has ever since been relied on as a case in point, in all cases of a similar nature.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grimke, J.

was of opinion, that upon the grounds urged by the prisoner’s counsel, and for the reasons set forth in the affidavit, the trial ought to be postponed. He observed, that there was a great difference between the case of a prisoner who had been committed only a day or two pre[3]*3vious to the sitting of the court, or during its session, and who, for the reasons mentioned, could not be supposed to be ready for trial; and that of one, who had sufficient time to summon his witnesses, and be fully prepared. The rule of law for putting off trials, was the same in criminal, as in civil cases. And the Court never would hurry on an unfortunate fellow-citizen to a trial, without giving him a reasonable time to prepare for his defence, however dangerous the nature of the offence might be, of which he stood accused. And relied on the case of Lord Kilmarnock and others, Fast. 2. as in point on this head.

The trial was accordingly put off, till the ensuing court of sessions.

Note. Although the above is only a Nisi Prius case, yet it has ever since been relied on as a case in point, in all cases of a similar nature.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.C.L. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lewis-pactcompl-1783.