State v. Lewis

853 P.2d 325, 121 Or. App. 199, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1062
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 16, 1993·No. CR91-0054, CR91-0055, CR91-0056, CR91-0057, CR91-0058, CR91-0059, CR91-0060, CR91-0061, CR91-0127; CA A73095, A73096, A73097, A73098, A73099, A73100, A73101, A73102, A73103·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant challenges the trial court’s sentence in his appeal of his convictions for four counts of unlawful taking of wildlife, ORS 498.012, four counts of unlawful sale of wildlife, ORS 498.022, and one count of failure to keep or submit fish records. ORS 508.540. All of the convictions are Class A misdemeanors. ORS 161.555(3).

The state concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing, and we accept its concession. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

Defendant’s other assignments of error do not require discussion.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lewis, 853 P.2d 325, 121 Or. App. 199, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1062 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

853 P.2d 325 (State v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lewis
903 P.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)