State v. Lewis
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-42381
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TANNER LEE LEWIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY T. Glenn Ellington, District Court Judge
Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Michael J. Thomas, Assistant Solicitor General Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee
Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Santa Fe, NM
for Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANISEE, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. Appellee has filed a notice with this Court informing us that they will not be filing a memorandum in opposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. REVERSED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Chief Judge
KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lewis (State v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.