State v. Lewis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lewis

539 S.W.3d 88

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 2018

DocketWD 80391

StatusPublished

This text of 539 S.W.3d 88 (State v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lewis, 539 S.W.3d 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*89Mr. Glen E. Lewis appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a trial by jury, by the Circuit Court of Boone County for one count of first-degree robbery and one count of armed criminal action. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Lewis argues the trial court abused its discretion in the admission of evidence that he argues was not relevant and the admission of the evidence was prejudicial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*89Mr. Glen E. Lewis appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a trial by jury, by the Circuit Court of Boone County for one count of first-degree robbery and one count of armed criminal action. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Lewis argues the trial court abused its discretion in the admission of evidence that he argues was not relevant and the admission of the evidence was prejudicial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.W.3d 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lewis-moctapp-2018.