State v. Lewis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lewis

390 S.W.3d 259, 2013 WL 326594, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 94

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 529 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. ED 97504·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Lewis appeals from his conviction of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Lewis appeals from his conviction of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Lewis, 390 S.W.3d 259, 2013 WL 326594, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 94 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

390 S.W.3d 259 (State v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.