State v. Lewis

924 S.W.2d 66, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1042, 1996 WL 332327
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1704
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 1996·No. No. 68967·Published

Opinion

KAROHL, Judge.

The State of Missouri appeals dismissal of a driving while intoxicated charge against defendant, Edward R. Lewis, Jr. The trial court found the prosecution of the charge was barred by the constitutional prohibition against Double Jeopardy because defendant previously had his license administratively suspended.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Mayo, 915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). There, the court held the sanction of a license revocation or suspension is not punishment for the purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. It held a charge of driving while intoxicated is not barred by Double Jeopardy because the defendant’s license had been administratively suspended. Thus, it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the charge against defendant. The facts of the present case are identical to those in Mayo and the holding is equally decisive.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

REINHARD, P.J., and GRIMM, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lewis, 924 S.W.2d 66, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1042, 1996 WL 332327 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

924 S.W.2d 66 (State v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mayo
915 S.W.2d 758 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1996)