State v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Lewis

366 A.2d 804, 172 Conn. 694

DecidedDecember 7, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 366 A.2d 804 (State v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lewis, 366 A.2d 804, 172 Conn. 694 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court for the judicial district of Waterbury with proper diligence, it is, under Prae[695]*695tice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant on or before December 28, 1976, files his brief.

Argued December 7 decided December 7, 1976 Michael J. Daly III, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Joseph A. Hill, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court for the judicial district of Waterbury with proper diligence, it is, under Prae[695]*695tice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant on or before December 28, 1976, files his brief.

Argued December 7 decided December 7, 1976 Michael J. Daly III, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Joseph A. Hill, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 A.2d 804, 172 Conn. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lewis-conn-1976.