State v. Levin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Levin

866 P.2d 526, 126 Or. App. 263, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 113, 1994 WL 28367

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 2, 1994

Docket92-CR-1206-FE; CA A78396

StatusPublished

This text of 866 P.2d 526 (State v. Levin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Levin, 866 P.2d 526, 126 Or. App. 263, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 113, 1994 WL 28367 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant is charged with four counts relating to growing marijuana. ORS 475.992; ORS 475.993. The trial court suppressed the evidence obtained as a result of a search, concluding that the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not demonstrate probable cause for the search.

On review of the affidavit, we disagree. The affidavit adequately sets out facts showing that there was probable cause to believe defendant maintained an ongoing operation growing and selling marijuana.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant is charged with four counts relating to growing marijuana. ORS 475.992; ORS 475.993. The trial court suppressed the evidence obtained as a result of a search, concluding that the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not demonstrate probable cause for the search.

On review of the affidavit, we disagree. The affidavit adequately sets out facts showing that there was probable cause to believe defendant maintained an ongoing operation growing and selling marijuana.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

866 P.2d 526, 126 Or. App. 263, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 113, 1994 WL 28367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-levin-orctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack