State v. Leurig

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Leurig

850 S.W.2d 107, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 343

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 1993·No. Nos. 60850, 62177·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986; sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1986; and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986; and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. .These appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(Z). We affirm the judgments.

The evidence in support of the jury’s verdict is not insufficient and no error of law appears; the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986; sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1986; and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986; and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. .These appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(Z). We affirm the judgments.

The evidence in support of the jury’s verdict is not insufficient and no error of law appears; the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Leurig, 850 S.W.2d 107, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 343 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

850 S.W.2d 107 (State v. Leurig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.