State v. Leupold
848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 730, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 457
This text of 848 P.2d 147 (State v. Leupold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Leupold, 848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 730, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 457 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(l)(a). He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized in a warrantless search. The state concedes that the court erred and we accept that concession.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 475.992
Oregon § 475.992
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 730, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-leupold-orctapp-1993.