State v. Leupold
848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 730, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 457
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(l)(a). He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized in a warrantless search. The state concedes that the court erred and we accept that concession.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Leupold, 848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 730, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 457 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
848 P.2d 147 (State v. Leupold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 475.992
Oregon § 475.992