State v. Lester
This text of 704 P.2d 1169 (State v. Lester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree. He contends that the court erred in admitting evidence respecting his participation in two other robberies and in imposing a mandatory minimum sentence in accordance with ORS 161.610. We conclude that the court did not err in admitting the evidence and affirm the conviction.
The state concedes that the court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, because there was no jury finding or admission by the defendant that he personally had used a gun in commission of the crime. See State v. Wedge, 293 Or 598, 652 P2d 773 (1982).
Conviction affirmed; judgment modified to delete five-year minimum imposed pursuant to ORS 161.610.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 P.2d 1169, 75 Or. App. 130, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lester-orctapp-1985.