State v. Lentz

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lentz

671 N.E.2d 544, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4074

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 1996·No. 96-1116·Published

Opinion

Erie App. No. E-95-005. On October 30, 1996, the Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association filed a motion for leave to file instanter an amicus curiae motion for reconsideration of this court’s decision entered October 16,1996. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(B), an amicus curiae may not file a motion for reconsideration without prior leave of this court. Whereas the motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration was not filed within ten days after the entry of the court’s order, it is considered by the court to be untimely. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to file instanter an amicus curiae motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erie App. No. E-95-005. On October 30, 1996, the Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association filed a motion for leave to file instanter an amicus curiae motion for reconsideration of this court’s decision entered October 16,1996. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(B), an amicus curiae may not file a motion for reconsideration without prior leave of this court. Whereas the motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration was not filed within ten days after the entry of the court’s order, it is considered by the court to be untimely. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to file instanter an amicus curiae motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, stricken.

State v. Lentz, 671 N.E.2d 544, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4074 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

671 N.E.2d 544 (State v. Lentz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.