State v. Lentz

671 N.E.2d 544, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4074
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 6, 1996
Docket96-1116
StatusPublished

This text of 671 N.E.2d 544 (State v. Lentz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lentz, 671 N.E.2d 544, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4074 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Erie App. No. E-95-005. On October 30, 1996, the Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association filed a motion for leave to file instanter an amicus curiae motion for reconsideration of this court’s decision entered October 16,1996. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(B), an amicus curiae may not file a motion for reconsideration without prior leave of this court. Whereas the motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration was not filed within ten days after the entry of the court’s order, it is considered by the court to be untimely. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to file instanter an amicus curiae motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 N.E.2d 544, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 4074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lentz-ohio-1996.