State v. Lemon

2023 Ohio 2027

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Lemon, 2023-Ohio-2027.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2023-L-047

Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas

RAMONE D. LEMON, Trial Court No. 2021 CR 000518 Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Decided: June 20, 2023 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Ramone D. Lemon, pro se, PID# A791-012, Trumbull Correctional Institution, 5701 Burnett Street, P.O. Box 901, Leavittsburg, OH 44430 (Defendant-Appellant).

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.

{¶1} On May 4, 2023, appellant, Ramone D. Lemon, pro se, filed a motion for

leave to file a delayed appeal pursuant to App.R. 5(A). No notice of appeal was filed with

the trial court.

{¶2} App.R. 5(A) provides:

{¶3} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: {¶4} “(a) Criminal proceedings;

{¶5} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

{¶6} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

{¶7} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and

shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right.

Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the trial

court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of the

notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. The movant also shall furnish an additional

copy of the notice of appeal and a copy of the motion for leave to appeal to the clerk of

the court of appeals who shall serve the notice of appeal and the motions upon the

prosecuting attorney.” (Emphasis added.)

{¶8} Appellant has not complied with App.R. 5(A) because he failed to file a

notice of appeal in the trial court concurrently with the filing of his motion for leave to

appeal with this court. See State v. Fisher, 46 Ohio App.2d 279 (1975). In addition,

appellant’s motion fails to advance reasons for filing an untimely appeal from the

November 5, 2019 entry he is appealing.

{¶9} Thus, appellant’s pro se motion is overruled. This matter is dismissed.

{¶10} We note that appellant is not barred from filing a new motion for leave to

appeal with this court and a notice of appeal in the trial court.

MATT LYNCH, J.,

EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,

concur. 2

Case No. 2023-L-047