State v. Lemle

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lemle

395 S.W.3d 87, 2013 WL 1438386, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 428

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 2013·No. No. ED 98227·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Alexander W. Lemle, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary in the second degree, in violation of section 569.170 RSMo (2000); property damage in the first degree, in violation of section 569.100; and stealing, in violation of section 570.030. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the [88] reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Alexander W. Lemle, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary in the second degree, in violation of section 569.170 RSMo (2000); property damage in the first degree, in violation of section 569.100; and stealing, in violation of section 570.030. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the [88] reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Lemle, 395 S.W.3d 87, 2013 WL 1438386, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

395 S.W.3d 87 (State v. Lemle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.